LAB XL BALANCED SCORECARD
|
Indicator |
Plan |
Do |
Check |
Learning |
Act (Adjust Plan) |
|
EPI #1. Removal of old chemicals from shelves |
Reduce amount of chemicals
in storage in labs |
Have labs do clean-outs of
out-of-date, unnecessary chemicals |
If successful expect to
see: 1. Decrease in number of chemicals in
inventory 2. Increase in number of virgin chemicals in
waste. |
1. We experienced resistance from lab workers
based on arbitrariness of definitions of “out-of-date” and “unnecessary.” 2. Researchers consider chemicals an
investment, not just a consumable. |
2006 Goal: Research
chemical purchasing data to identify ways that purchases can be
decreased. Continue to research
inventory management system. 1. Continue to use clean-outs as opportunities
for chemical reduction. In research
labs, best opportunity to get clean-outs is around lab moves and personnel
changes. 2. Encourage labs to examine chemicals as they
do annual inventories and clean out unusable chemicals. 3. In teaching labs, ongoing tracking of
chemicals used can lead to annual or biennial chemical clean-outs. |
|
Indicator |
Plan |
Do |
Check |
Learning |
Act (Adjust Plan) |
|
EPI #2. Annual HCOC inventory |
Reduce number of Hazardous
Chemicals of Concern in labs. |
1. Labs submit total chemical inventory as per
Local Emergency Planning requirements.
2. EHS reviews total inventories to identify
and track HCOCs. |
If successful expect to
see: 1. Fewer HCOCs stored in labs. |
The issue in labs is not
quantity, but more importantly the proper handling of HCOCs. |
2006 Goal:
See #1. 1. Establish program of
regular reminders on checking HCOCs. 2. Chemistry Department has
created a list of SOPs for common HCOCs. |
|
EPI #3. Pollution Prevention Assessments |
Identify activities that
will lead to a reduction in hazardous waste produced by labs. |
Researchers examine
particular experiments and practices to identify methods to reduce waste
volume. |
If successful expect to
see: 1. Reduction in waste volume. 2. Better purchasing controls and housekeeping
practices. |
1. It is impossible to determine the
effectiveness of small waste reduction activities when they are masked by
35,000 pounds of total waste. 2. There is currently no mechanism for
normalizing waste production against some known measure like grant money, lab
space, etc. |
2006 Goal:
Collect references on toxic and waste reduction opportunities that can
be used in training and marketing. 1. Identify small scale activities where it is
possible to measure total flow-through. 2. Identify sources and direct researchers to
information about product substitution and waste minimization in their
fields. 3. Continue to emphasize preferred waste
management practices that have less toxic outcomes (e.g. separating
halogenated and non-halogenated wastes). |
|
Indicator |
Plan |
Do |
Check |
Learning |
Act (Adjust Plan) |
|
EPI #4. Chemical
redistribution |
Reduce the volume of waste
disposed by allowing chemicals to be offered to other labs when deemed
“waste” by the generator. (This
applies to virgin chemicals.) |
Inventory discarded usable chemicals
and make available to other labs. |
If successful expect to
see: More virgin chemicals being
removed from clean-outs, disposal of virgin materials decreasing. |
1. There is not a regular waste stream of
discarded usable materials. These materials
come primarily from clean-outs. 2. Researchers are extremely hesitant to use
discarded material of “unknown” origin.
The fact that a chemical is discarded makes it less desirable than
borrowing the same chemical from a trusted source. |
2006 Goal:
Work at waste reduction from the perspective of purchasing and
housekeeping controls and inventory management. “Buy only what you need.” Continue to use waste
clean-outs as an opportunity to offer chemicals for reuse. However, it is not cost effective to
maintain a stock of discarded chemicals. |
|
EPI #5. Annual accounting of hazardous waste
produced by labs. |
Tracking annual waste
production from labs will provide information on waste reduction
opportunities. |
Data are collected from
hazardous waste manifests and lab waste pick-up forms. |
Comparison of annual waste
totals reported in annual Project XL report, Table 3. |
In order to measure waste
reduction we need to have a way to say “The total waste volume has increased
due to growth, but we are producing less waste per X.” |
2006 Goal:
Work with institutional and sponsored research departments and waste
generators to determine if there is a formula for normalization. Symposium to be held in FY
06. |
|
EPI #6. Environmental awareness survey |
Environmental awareness of
lab workers should increase with training and working within the |
Conduct an annual
environmental awareness survey. |
Results reported in annual
report. |
Surveys can provide useful
attitudinal information as well as information on content knowledge. |
Goal:
Redesign the survey to become a means of measuring changes in
behaviors and attitudes resulting from activities implemented in other parts
of the |
|
Indicator |
Plan |
Do |
Check |
Learning |
Act (Adjust Plan) |
|
EPI #7. Training |
Training in the EMP will
lead to changes in behaviors, practices and attitudes, ultimately leading to
waste reduction. |
Conduct annual initial and
refresher waste training. |
Compliance audits and
annual surveys indicate effectiveness of training. |
Training, personal contact,
and communication are keys to an effective management system. Communication which includes inquiry is
especially useful in honing training content. |
2006 Goal:
Expand training to include written and online resources. Provide
incentives (like web-based forms) to direct people to additional resources. Expand training successes
from Chemistry to all departments. |
|
EPI #8. EMP Effectiveness |
Completion of this
scorecard is a systematic way to measure the success of the EMP. |
|
|
Review of the scorecard
suggests some larger strategic goals to apply to laboratory waste management. |
2006 Goal:
Create a summary of the next steps proposed in this report and use
them to develop or adjust programs.
Use them also as a measuring stick for success of the Project in 2005-6. Provide a cost accounting
analysis for waste management. Adjust management plan
procedures based on results of audits. -
Create
new labels -
Create
waste pick-up feedback form |
|
Indicator |
Plan |
Do |
Check |
Learning |
Act (Adjust Plan) |
|
EPI #9. Conformance with the EMP |
Audits of the labs are a
measure of lab workers’ conformance with the EMP. |
Lab audits occur numerous
times throughout the year. |
Review and report audit
scores. |
Program improvements
increase when audits are done more frequently and from the perspectives of
different types of auditors. |
2006 Goal:
Develop audit reporting steps that can be delivered to the lab
workers, the PIs, and departmentally. Publish generic audit
findings in newsletters and on the web.
Use audit scores to shape training program content. |